<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
		<rss version="2.0">
		  <channel>
				<title><![CDATA[&quot;Serving the energy market&quot; - Articles - ]]></title>
				<link>http://www.erasmusenergy.com</link>
				<description />
				<language>en-us</language>
				<copyright><![CDATA[http://www.erasmusenergy.com]]></copyright>
				<generator>N/A</generator>
				<webMaster>dejong@maycroft.com</webMaster>
				<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:07:35 CEST</lastBuildDate>
			
				<ttl>20</ttl>

					<item>
					  <title><![CDATA[Getting physical]]></title>
					  <link>http://www.erasmusenergy.com/articles/74/1/Getting-physical/Page1.html</link>
					  <description><![CDATA[Keywords: <br/>Published in: Energy Risk<br/>Publication year: 2004<br/><br/><br/>Asset-backed trading strategies usually employ a combination of physical positions, which are subject to physical risk; and financial hedging intruments, which are not. Here, Steve Leppard shows how value-at-risk, applied to this combined risk scenario, can go a long way towards the thorny issue of hedging physically risky power generation assets.]]></description>
					  <author>no@spam.com (Steve Leppard)</author>
					  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:59:47 CEST</pubDate>
					 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.erasmusenergy.com/articles/74/1/Getting-physical/Page1.html</guid>
					</item>

				
				  </channel>
				</rss>
			